Market comparison
Bozeman, MT vs Whitefish, MT
On modelled numbers, Whitefish carries the higher annual revenue and Bozeman the stronger occupancy. Same state alternatives
Modelled estimate
| Bozeman, MT | Whitefish, MT | |
|---|---|---|
| Modelled annual revenue | $58,900 | $65,000 |
| Nightly rate | $278 | $318 |
| Occupancy | 58% | 56% |
| Nights booked a year | 212 | 204 |
| Peak season | Jun–Jul–Aug | Jan–Feb–Mar |
| Season concentration | 45% in top 4 months | 52% in top 4 months |
| Modelled purchase price | $415,000 | $475,000 |
| Modelled cash-on-cash | 15% | 13% |
| Break-even occupancy | 36% | 36% |
| Mid-term monthly rent | $3,750 | $4,300 |
| Short vs mid-term | Close | Close |
| Rule status | Status unpublished | Status unpublished |
| Market type | mountain | ski |
Operating costs are modelled at 32% of gross revenue for a nightly rental (cleaning, supplies, utilities, platform fees, maintenance, insurance) and 14% for a monthly rental. Financing assumes a 25% down payment and a 30-year loan at 7%. These are planning assumptions, not quotes — replace them with your own numbers. Rule status is only stated where we hold an official source; otherwise it is marked as needing verification on each market's regulation page.
Dig into Bozeman, MT
Dig into Whitefish, MT
Want a second opinion on your property?
Send us the address and we will tell you what we think it can do, what the local rules require, and whether co-hosting makes sense for you.