Market comparison
Mammoth Lakes, CA vs South Lake Tahoe, CA
On modelled numbers, Mammoth Lakes carries the higher annual revenue and South Lake Tahoe the stronger occupancy. Similar market type in the same state
| Mammoth Lakes, CA | South Lake Tahoe, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Modelled annual revenue | $73,200 | $68,300 |
| Nightly rate | $352 | $312 |
| Occupancy | 57% | 60% |
| Nights booked a year | 208 | 219 |
| Peak season | Jan–Feb–Mar | Jan–Feb–Mar |
| Season concentration | 52% in top 4 months | 52% in top 4 months |
| Modelled purchase price | $525,000 | $465,000 |
| Modelled cash-on-cash | 14% | 16% |
| Break-even occupancy | 36% | 36% |
| Mid-term monthly rent | $4,750 | $4,200 |
| Short vs mid-term | Close | Nightly ahead |
| Rule status | Status unpublished | Status unpublished |
| Market type | ski | ski |
Operating costs are modelled at 32% of gross revenue for a nightly rental (cleaning, supplies, utilities, platform fees, maintenance, insurance) and 14% for a monthly rental. Financing assumes a 25% down payment and a 30-year loan at 7%. These are planning assumptions, not quotes — replace them with your own numbers. Rule status is only stated where we hold an official source; otherwise it is marked as needing verification on each market's regulation page.
Dig into Mammoth Lakes, CA
Dig into South Lake Tahoe, CA
Want a second opinion on your property?
Send us the address and we will tell you what we think it can do, what the local rules require, and whether co-hosting makes sense for you.