Market comparison
Mammoth Lakes, CA vs Palm Springs, CA
On modelled numbers, Palm Springs carries the higher annual revenue and Palm Springs the stronger occupancy. Same state alternatives
Modelled estimate
| Mammoth Lakes, CA | Palm Springs, CA | |
|---|---|---|
| Modelled annual revenue | $73,200 | $79,700 |
| Nightly rate | $352 | $352 |
| Occupancy | 57% | 62% |
| Nights booked a year | 208 | 226 |
| Peak season | Jan–Feb–Mar | Jan–Feb–Mar |
| Season concentration | 52% in top 4 months | 45% in top 4 months |
| Modelled purchase price | $525,000 | $525,000 |
| Modelled cash-on-cash | 14% | 17% |
| Break-even occupancy | 36% | 36% |
| Mid-term monthly rent | $4,750 | $4,750 |
| Short vs mid-term | Close | Nightly ahead |
| Rule status | Status unpublished | Status unpublished |
| Market type | ski | desert |
Operating costs are modelled at 32% of gross revenue for a nightly rental (cleaning, supplies, utilities, platform fees, maintenance, insurance) and 14% for a monthly rental. Financing assumes a 25% down payment and a 30-year loan at 7%. These are planning assumptions, not quotes — replace them with your own numbers. Rule status is only stated where we hold an official source; otherwise it is marked as needing verification on each market's regulation page.
Dig into Mammoth Lakes, CA
Dig into Palm Springs, CA
Want a second opinion on your property?
Send us the address and we will tell you what we think it can do, what the local rules require, and whether co-hosting makes sense for you.